The resources mobilization theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The resources mobilization theory - Essay ExampleSocial movement based on the definition shows that there ar different conflicting groups engaging in a conflict to achieve certain objectives. Social movement is characterised by a number of features such as leadership, organization of the group and the activity the kind movement group want to solve. The resources mobilization theory applies to social movement beca persona social movement uses non-violent ways to inform the public and thereby making them awargon of their goals. Achievements of the goals would happen because most of the pursuant know more about the community and the problems they are facing. Because of this, they pursue them to demonstrate peacefully and solve their grievances such as unemployment. Small community facing problems are acted upon by small networks, after that, more networks are created which would be strong to pursue the governing body such as federal government. Some of the social movements that work together to achieve their goals include the frolicsome and lesbian rights movement. Gay and lesbian rights movements have been demonstrative to express their rights and to be recognised by others. The groups have achieved their goals using ready(prenominal) resources such as the makeup of strong organizations (Costain and McFarland 59). Political revolutions arise when there is poor governance, which could be because of the changes the government made or the situation of governance is worse than the previous government. Political revolutions use both non-violent and violent ways to express their grievances to the governing body. The theory of relative deprivation relates well to political revolution this can be shown by mavin of the political revolution which took place in US. The... The resources mobilization theory The framing theory is a process by which people change their ideas based on issues (Shepard 543). The resources mobilization theory is compelling because it directl y points out that it is the resource which determines the rise of social movements. According to the theory, resources can be used by individuals to criticise the ecesis or government. The resources in few are money, knowledge, internal or external support. Such resources help in supporting the social movements because their availability facilitates groups of individual to manoeuvre themselves. According to Shepard (543), resources such as money, power and leadership skills helped the civil rights movements in 1960 to stage wide spread protest. The author further shows that it is the resources at the centre of all uprising. In cases where resources are limited or not available, revolutions would not happen. This can be explained from one of the gay rights movements which failed because of unavailable resources. The other theories are close to the resources mobilization theory the theory of relative deprivation shows the comparison done by persons thinking that they do not have en ough or equal resources as others. The decision is made on the theory of resources mobilization because it is an instant way of rise in political revolution which can be facilitated by available resources. Despite the high expectation of digital media, the platform has some pitfalls to social and political revolutions.